Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
On 3/1/19 3:44 AM, Marty Kraimer wrote:
> Will and I had some private messages and now I think I can give an explanation of what we found.
> pvcall appears to assume that both the client and server use normative type nturi.
Correct.
I've seen four different developers find four different ways to encode RPC arguments.
Mutually incompatible of course. Providing 'pvcall' is my attempt to encourage the
use of a single scheme, to facilitate interoperability.
> Now I have some questions about pvcall and channelRPC.
> Is pvcall meant to replace eget?
eget remains available for those who wish to use it.
https://github.com/epics-base/eget
> Are there plans for future enhancements to channelRPC?
> If yes then what is the status?
If you mean a change to force the use of NTURI? No.
The foot gun will remain loaded.
- Replies:
- Re: Basic PVAccess question will.rogers--- via Tech-talk
- References:
- Basic PVAccess question will.rogers--- via Tech-talk
- Re: Basic PVAccess question Marty Kraimer via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
The scope they are using is a Tektronix DPO 4104 Luchini, Kristi L. via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: Basic PVAccess question will.rogers--- via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
<2019>
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Basic PVAccess question Marty Kraimer via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: Basic PVAccess question will.rogers--- via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
<2019>
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024