Some repos request that changes go to Launchpad.
Cheers,
Will
________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk <[email protected]>
Sent: 04 March 2019 23:57:36
To: Marty Kraimer
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Basic PVAccess question
On 3/1/19 3:44 AM, Marty Kraimer wrote:
Will and I had some private messages and now I think I can give an explanation of what we found.
pvcall appears to assume that both the client and server use normative type nturi.
Correct.
I've seen four different developers find four different ways to encode RPC arguments.
Mutually incompatible of course. Providing 'pvcall' is my attempt to encourage the
use of a single scheme, to facilitate interoperability.
Now I have some questions about pvcall and channelRPC.
Is pvcall meant to replace eget?
eget remains available for those who wish to use it.
https://github.com/epics-base/eget
Are there plans for future enhancements to channelRPC?
If yes then what is the status?
If you mean a change to force the use of NTURI? No.
The foot gun will remain loaded.
