Re: Going full PVA?

[Ralph Lange via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>]

On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 15:31, Stainer Tom via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> wrote:

 

Do you mean PVA to CA when writing through that IOC? That works when the QSRV mapping is done in the right way (which is not always trivial).

Or another IOC that maps a device speaking PVA into a flat CA control system namespace? Don't really know.

 

I meant the former. It just isn't entirely clear to me how you would implement this in practice.

Do you happen to know of any example code or associated documentation that I can use as a baseline on how to use QSRV to do this?

Nothing apart from the QSRV documentation:

https://docs.epics-controls.org/projects/pva2pva/en/latest/doxygen/qsrv_page.html#qsrv_config 

Not trivial, agreed. But the problem it solves is not trivial, either.

Cheers,

~Ralph