| 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 <2021> 2022 2023 2024 2025 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 <2021> 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
| <== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
|---|
| Subject: | Re: [EXTERNAL] Java & CA |
| From: | "Kasemir, Kay via Tech-talk" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> |
| To: | "tech-talk at aps.anl.gov" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>, Pavel Cheblakov <P.B.Cheblakov at inp.nsk.su> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Oct 2021 01:28:24 +0000 |
|
Hi:
> we want to develop some Java application using Channel Access and I'm
confused what Java implementation better to use. I incline to pure Java
implementation. But what about stability and rationality of existed solutions? As for confusion, in the past there was the JCA lib that defines an API and offers a JNI-based implementation, and the separate CAJ implementation of that API in pure Java. For a while now, they have been merged, so from https://github.com/epics-base/jca you get that same JCA API with the one and only implementation, CAJ, included. It's the lib that has been
used by for example CS-Studio for decades.
|