1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 <2022> 2023 2024 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 <2022> 2023 2024 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: Can't properly restrict IOC CA server to an interface |
From: | Jure Varlec via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> |
To: | EPICS tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:50:18 +0000 |
Hi Michael,
> Binding a socket to a specific interface doesn't always work so well > when that interface disappears and reappears. You mention "wifi" and > "after a reboot or several", this makes me wonder if your network > interface(s) are being deleted and recreated. I agree that could be a problem if the IOC would be started during boot. But it is not. This is my development system and I'm starting the IOC
manually, after all the interfaces are already set up. So I don't think this
is it, or at least, I don't see how it could be.
I brought out the debugger and dug into the code today. The socket is
bound, so I don't see why a "random" source address would be chosen
by the OS. I went a step further and extended cas_send_dg_msg(): I
replaced sendto() with sendmsg(), adding ancillary message data
via IP_PKTINFO socket option in order to override the source address.
It "works", in the sense that if I use a non-existent address, the sending
fails. However, if I use a valid source address, the IP header will contain
the address of the WiFi interface instead.
This is totally bizarre. I'm now convinced that the OS is rewriting the
address after the packet leaves the IOC, but I don't know how or why.
I quote the relevant part of systemd-networkd config below if anyone
has experience with a similar setup. I don't see anything special. Is it
possible that a bridge interface with an IP behaves differently than
a physical interface? AFAIK, assigning an IP address to a bridge is
standard practice and recommended, but I could be mistaken.
Best,
Jure
==> 20-machines.netdev <==
[Match] Host=* [NetDev] Kind=bridge Name=machines ==> 20-machines.network <== [Match] Name=machines [Network] Address=10.1.1.1/24 DHCPServer=true IPForward=true IPMasquerade=true [DHCPServer] DNS=10.1.1.1 EmitDNS=true PoolOffset=128 PoolSize=100 |