EPICS Home

Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System


 
2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  <2025 Index 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  <2025
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: Did the "Fedora-latest" version on GitHub just get bumped?
From: Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk <core-talk at aps.anl.gov>
To: "Johnson, Andrew N." <anj at anl.gov>
Cc: EPICS core-talk <core-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:06:46 -0700
On 4/17/25 08:13, Johnson, Andrew N. wrote:
On 4/17/25, 9:27 AM, "Michael Davidsaver" <mdavidsaver at gmail.com> wrote:

On 4/16/25 09:34, Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk wrote:

I saw that a new Fedora was release very recently.

Yes.  Now comes GCC 15, which defaults to C23.

... Ah that wasn’t a PR, and your Fedora CI job did fail,

I noticed this first failure during a PVXS build, and made a quick fix
hoping that this would be the only issue.  No such luck...


but apparently we don’t get notifications when non-PR jobs fail. Can/should we change that in the CI?

Not that I know of, but GHA gets new options all the time.


Looking at the specific code that’s failing, in this case I think the fix is just adding a cast to DEVSUPFUN* since we only print the pointer. I just pushed a commit to try that, this job <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/anjohnson/epics-base/actions/runs/14518774891/job/40734270393__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YKyfLVxvUKjYx8LCX8RI-WiIX1CKZ5bUoMMzS3H6vMYXVj-TVwZFzSGpU9sc6AXT_hLKRr6tBE-PO5ZYnEDCtYeyPQ$ > shows that seemed to work <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/anjohnson/epics-base/actions/runs/14518774891/job/40734270393*step:8:4731__;Iw!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YKyfLVxvUKjYx8LCX8RI-WiIX1CKZ5bUoMMzS3H6vMYXVj-TVwZFzSGpU9sc6AXT_hLKRr6tBE-PO5ZYnECnboF3HA$ >, but there are other similar failures later in the build <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/anjohnson/epics-base/actions/runs/14518774891/job/40734270393*step:8:6704__;Iw!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YKyfLVxvUKjYx8LCX8RI-WiIX1CKZ5bUoMMzS3H6vMYXVj-TVwZFzSGpU9sc6AXT_hLKRr6tBE-PO5ZYnEBPdWAjWg$ >, which I will look at.

- Andrew

--

Complexity comes for free, Simplicity you have to work for.



References:
Did the "Fedora-latest" version on GitHub just get bumped? Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk
Re: Did the "Fedora-latest" version on GitHub just get bumped? Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
Re: Did the "Fedora-latest" version on GitHub just get bumped? Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: RE: Did the "Fedora-latest" version on GitHub just get bumped? Zimoch Dirk via Core-talk
Next: Re: Did the "Fedora-latest" version on GitHub just get bumped? Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  <2025
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: RE: Did the "Fedora-latest" version on GitHub just get bumped? Zimoch Dirk via Core-talk
Next: Re: Did the "Fedora-latest" version on GitHub just get bumped? Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  <2025