Re: softIOC and SIGHUP

[Ralph Lange <Ralph.Lange@bessy.de>]

 Hello Dmitry,

On 21-Sep-2010 06:50, Dmitry Teytelman wrote:
> Hello Ralph,
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:23, Ralph Lange<Ralph.Lange@bessy.de>  wrote:
> > It would be great if you opened a bug report [...]
> Done (with a patch).

Great, thanks a lot!!

> > Also, is there any particular reason to not run the IOC inside a wrapper
> > like procServ [2]? That would remove the need to use nohup in the first
> > place.
> I've learned of procServ fairly recently and have not had a chance to
> investigate it in depth. Overall, since nohup does (or at least used
> to do) exactly what's needed, I've looked no further. Application in
> question does not tolerate IOC restarts, so if the IOC dies for any
> reason we want to know about it. I understand that procServ is very
> powerful and flexible, but there so many other problems to work on :(

That's fine, of course. Just wanted to know your motivation.
The two main things that procServ would give you in this case are access 
to your IOC console through telnet (while it's running), and logging the 
console output to a file (to find out why it died). Auto-reboot is 
configurable.
</advertisement>

Cheers,
Ralph