| 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 <2005> 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 <2005> 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
| <== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
|---|
| Subject: | RE: CA Connect rates under RTEMS |
| From: | "Feng, Shuchen" <[email protected]> |
| To: | "Feng, Shuchen" <[email protected]>, "Nolan, William" <[email protected]> |
| Cc: | "''[email protected] ' '" <[email protected]>, "''[email protected]' '" <[email protected]>, "''[email protected]' '" <[email protected]>, "''Till Straumann ' '" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 26 Mar 2005 16:43:27 -0500 |
Kate Feng wrote : >I finally got around to compare the CA connect rate and catime between >RTEMS-mvme5500 and vxWorks-mvme5500. The conclusion is that EPICS/RTEMS >and EPICS/vxWorks is competitive to each other while tested under the >same network setup. My apologies for misspelling. I meant the catime test showed that EPICS/RTEMS-mvme5500 and EPICS/vxWorks-mvme5500 are "comparable" to each other while tested under the same network setup. They showed similar performance for 1K channels, but for the 10K channels case, EPICS/RTEMS-mvme5500 shows higher performance. The test was done in a very busy subnet. Cheers, Kate