Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
Thanks for sharing, Claude!
I have been watching DDS "from the sidelines" for some time now.
Ignoring the technical details, my chief reservation is that DDS
does not
seem to be achieving widespread support, despite active marketing by RTI.
Disclaimer: I am actually a very satisfied user of other RTI S/W, but trying
to use a communication standard that is not widely adopted gives me visions
of trying to make hotel reservations in Esperanto. :-)
On the plus side, DDS does provide "connection management" (built
on top of UDP/IP), and (more importantly, perhaps) includes some level
of support for user-defined Quality of Service (QoS) parameters when
establishing connections.
Did you learn anything about DDS's QoS capabilities that could
(theoretically) be applied to CA?
-- Larry
- Replies:
- Re: evaluation of OMG DDS as a controls protocol for EPICS Claude Saunders
- References:
- evaluation of OMG DDS as a controls protocol for EPICS Claude Saunders
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
evaluation of OMG DDS as a controls protocol for EPICS Claude Saunders
- Next:
alarm handler question: group FORCEPVs and severities at alh startup Rock, Judith E.
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
<2007>
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
evaluation of OMG DDS as a controls protocol for EPICS Claude Saunders
- Next:
Re: evaluation of OMG DDS as a controls protocol for EPICS Claude Saunders
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
<2007>
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025