Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
On 07/15/2015 07:56 AM, Benjamin Franksen wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 July 2015 12:16:38 Pete Jemian wrote:
>> Is your analysis of "expensive" based on initial cost, total life
>> cost, or perhaps some other criteria?
Our experience is that maintenance cost can be significantly lower for
Linux machines. You can use all kinds of modern development, deployment
and monitoring tools that are not available for VxWorks/RTEMS. You can
leverage the advantages of a multitasking OS and powerful multi-core
hardware (if needed).
> Also note that Linux is not a real-time system, which may or may not
> be a problem depending on the application.
Our strategy is to move as many real-time tasks as we can to PLCs, motor
controllers or FPGAs. In most cases this means we can run standard Linux
on our PCs.
> It may also be a potential security risk, given that the amount of
> readily available tools for an attack is much larger on Linux (or any
> other general purpose OS like Windows or MacOSX), compared to VxWorks
> or RTEMS.
You are right: The amount of malware targeted on Linux is bigger than
the amount of malware targeted on RTOS. However, the number of attacks
on industrial devices has been grown dramatically within the last years.
Also note that security issues affecting a Linux base installation are
usually fixed much faster and can be deployed much easier/faster using
tools like share libraries and software packages.
> And cutting something like Linux down to the essentials
> needed for running one or more soft IOCs (in order to avoid these
> risks) is not something I'd take on lightly.
On the other hand most VxWorks/RTEMS machines I've seen so far were
using technology like telnet (instead of SSH), NFS (no encryption,
single point of failure) and did not provide any useful IT monitoring
(fan speed? temperature? free disk space? ECC errors?)... RTEMS is also
lacking support for time synchronization using PTP which will be the
default for FRIB.
Our answer is a combination of real time tasks in PLCs/motor
controllers/FPGAs + high-level processes on Linux leveraging the latest
tools to help the administrator maintain it.
-Martin
--
Martin Konrad
Control System Engineer
Facility for Rare Isotope Beams
Michigan State University
640 South Shaw Lane
East Lansing, MI 48824-1321, USA
Tel. 517-908-7253
Email: [email protected]
- Replies:
- Re: Linux vs. RTOS: cost and security; was: Stepper Motor Controllers Benjamin Franksen
- References:
- Stepper Motor Controllers Mark Davis
- Re: Stepper Motor Controllers Mark Davis
- Re: Stepper Motor Controllers Pete Jemian
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Stepper Motor Controllers Pearson, Matthew R.
- Next:
RE: Stepper Motor Controllers Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
<2015>
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Stepper Motor Controllers Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
Re: Linux vs. RTOS: cost and security; was: Stepper Motor Controllers Benjamin Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
<2015>
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024