EPICS Home

Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System


 
1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  <20192020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  <20192020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: Point Grey GigE Blackfly conflict
From: Mark Rivers via Tech-talk <[email protected]>
To: Nilson Pereira <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:44:45 +0000
I'm just curious if you tried changing the Linux system buffer settings?  If you do that then I think you should be able to run all 3 cameras with the default 400 microsecond packet delay, and not have to worry about frame rates in the future (limited of course by the total shared GigE bandwidth available).


Mark




________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Nilson Pereira via Tech-talk <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 2:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Point Grey GigE Blackfly conflict


Hello there,

I finally had the time to test different settings for the multiple GigE cameras and what really made the difference was the "GigE Packet Delay" settings. Since our frame rate  is around 1 fps, I could push the packet delay to 5000 (in microseconds I believe) on all 3 cameras and now all cameras work simultaneously.

If I have to push a higher frame rate, I believe this delay have to be better calculated, but for now it fulfills my requirements.

Thank you all for the support.

Best,

Nilson

On 08.02.19 09:16, Nilson Pereira via Tech-talk wrote:

Hi,

Answering Kazimierz question, I am running IOCs on a Linux Ubuntu 16.04 virtual machine on our server.

The cameras are being used right now and I cannot test the suggest tuning of the network and camera parameters. I will post my results as soon as I get them done.

For now, moving one of the cameras IOC to another virtual machine did the trick, but now I am interested to find out If I can make them work from a single machine. I will report back.

Thank you all for suggestions and shared info.

Nilson

On 07.02.19 18:15, Gofron, Kazimierz wrote:

Hi Nilson,



What OS are you running Point Gray camera on? If it is Windows, then it is an intrinsic issue of the OS to run more than 1 camera, not related to network tuning, but Windows itself.



Kazimierz



Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 10:17:19 +0100

From: Nilson Pereira <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

Subject: Point Grey GigE Blackfly conflict

Message-ID: <[email protected]<[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]>>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed



Hello community,



I have 3 cameras (Point Grey GigE Blackfly) that I want to use

simultaneously at a very low framerate (1fps) for BPM purposes.



Each camera has its own IOC and they run perfectly one at a time.

However, when running simultaneously, always 2 cameras conflict with

each other and not necessary the same two cameras. During conflict, the

IOC shows an error about frame inconsistency on both affected cameras. I

have a gigabit network port on both switch and server, and the port is

far from saturation.



Does anyone have experience with GigE cameras and have seem this type of

problem? Is this a protocol issue since it happens even with the

original (Flycap2) software ?



I appreciate any shared experience with problems with GigE cameras that

could give a hint on why this is happening.



Best,



Nilson





________________________________



Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin f?r Materialien und Energie GmbH



Mitglied der Hermann von Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren e.V.



Aufsichtsrat: Vorsitzender Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher, stv. Vorsitzende Dr. Jutta Koch-Unterseher

Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Bernd Rech (kommissarisch), Thomas Frederking



Sitz Berlin, AG Charlottenburg, 89 HRB 5583



Postadresse:

Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1

D-14109 Berlin




________________________________

Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH

Mitglied der Hermann von Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren e.V.

Aufsichtsrat: Vorsitzender Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher, stv. Vorsitzende Dr. Jutta Koch-Unterseher
Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr. Bernd Rech (kommissarisch), Thomas Frederking

Sitz Berlin, AG Charlottenburg, 89 HRB 5583

Postadresse:
Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1
D-14109 Berlin

________________________________

Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH

Mitglied der Hermann von Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren e.V.

Aufsichtsrat: Vorsitzender Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher, stv. Vorsitzende Dr. Jutta Koch-Unterseher
Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr. Bernd Rech (kommissarisch), Thomas Frederking

Sitz Berlin, AG Charlottenburg, 89 HRB 5583

Postadresse:
Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1
D-14109 Berlin

Replies:
Re: Point Grey GigE Blackfly conflict Nilson Pereira via Tech-talk
References:
RE: Point Grey GigE Blackfly conflict Gofron, Kazimierz via Tech-talk
Re: Point Grey GigE Blackfly conflict Nilson Pereira via Tech-talk
Re: Point Grey GigE Blackfly conflict Nilson Pereira via Tech-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: Point Grey GigE Blackfly conflict Nilson Pereira via Tech-talk
Next: RE: EPICS and VXI query Mark Rivers via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  <20192020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: Point Grey GigE Blackfly conflict Nilson Pereira via Tech-talk
Next: Re: Point Grey GigE Blackfly conflict Nilson Pereira via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  <20192020  2021  2022  2023  2024