1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 <2025> | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 <2025> |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | Re: Video camera for use in high magnetic field |
From: | "Cobb, Tom \(DLSLtd,RAL,LSCI\) via Tech-talk" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> |
To: | "tech-talk at aps.anl.gov" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>, John Dobbins <john.dobbins at cornell.edu> |
Date: | Tue, 8 Apr 2025 12:03:06 +0000 |
Hi John,
Some manufacturers make board level versions of their cameras where the sensor is separated from the rest of the camera with a ribbon cable, for instance AVT:
I don't know if that would give you enough distance though...
Thanks,
Tom
From: Tech-talk <tech-talk-bounces at aps.anl.gov> on behalf of John Dobbins via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Sent: 07 April 2025 20:43 To: tech-talk at aps.anl.gov <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> Subject: Video camera for use in high magnetic field
All,
This isn't an EPICS question but I know there is also vast collective knowledge of non-EPICS instrumentation issues.
At CHESS we are constructing a high magnetic field x-ray beamline. A sample view camera, if placed outside the 5 gauss line is essentially an astronomical telescope, to provide ~ 10 um resolution at 5 meters.
If we had something compatible with magnetic fields, i.e has no magnetic material, it could be placed much closer to the sample.
Gige cameras typical have ethernet magnetics.
One could imagine a USB camera. These typically have DC-DC converters which use ferrite inductors or transformers.
I could imagine building a camera from scratch which gets around these issues ( e.g. liner regulators)
But I am fishing for advice.
Thanks,
John Dobbins
Research Support Specialist
Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source
Cornell University
|