Two similar requests
Allen Biocca (ALS) requested that the access security rules should accept a host
name OR inet address. This sounds like a valid request.
Thus instead of
HAG(hag1) {mercury}
The user could specify
HAG(hag1) {164.54.8.12}
The other request is let a PCAS application know the inet address of a client.
Andrew thinks that this is what caSnooper needs. Ken can correct me if this is
wrong.
Thus both requests amount to finding the inet addresss of a client.
For access security it means RSRV must make it available. Currently RSRV calls
asAddClient(asClientPvt,asMemberPvt,asl,user,host)
This could be changed to
asAddClient(asClientPvt,asMemberPvt,asl,user,host,inetAddr)
What do you think?
Marty
- Replies:
- RE: INET address Jeff Hill
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: base max thread priority Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Gateway Marty Kraimer
- Index:
<2002>
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: base max thread priority Andrew Johnson
- Next:
RE: INET address Jeff Hill
- Index:
<2002>
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
|