On 11/18/2014 04:48 PM, Andrew Johnson wrote:
> Thanks, but running this on VxWorks I get:
>
> ok 28 - !epicsRingPointerIsFull(ring)
> ok 29 - epicsRingPointerGetFree(ring)==rsize
> ok 30 - epicsRingPointerGetSize(ring)==rsize
> ok 31 - epicsRingPointerGetUsed(ring)==0
> # single producer, single consumer without locking
> Bail out! Can't run test from thread with highest priority
Actually I even get that when I run the test in a priority=100 thread
(VxWorks task priorities go from 1=highest to 255=lowest).
- Andrew
--
People everywhere confuse what they read in newspapers with news.
-- A. J. Liebling
- Replies:
- Re: ringPointerTest Andrew Johnson
- References:
- ringPointerTest Andrew Johnson
- Re: ringPointerTest Michael Davidsaver
- Re: ringPointerTest Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: ringPointerTest Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: 3.15.0.2: Shutdown issues Benjamin Franksen
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
<2014>
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: ringPointerTest Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: ringPointerTest Andrew Johnson
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
<2014>
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
|