Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  <20152016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  Index 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  <20152016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: dbl output and record name aliases
From: "Kasemir, Kay" <kasemirk@ornl.gov>
To: Ralph Lange <Ralph.Lange@gmx.de>
Cc: EPICS Core-Talk <core-talk@aps.anl.gov>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 14:09:19 +0000
Hi:

IRMIS and the SNS 'crawler' that's derived from it go to quite some length parsing the st.cmd file and expanding macros in there to locate and finally parse the *.db files.
Would be great to get more of that information from the IOC shell:  record name, type, fields-defined-in-*.db file

Could that be done by adding "-.." options to the existing dbl command?

  dbl -type -alias -fields 

The plain ASCII listing was OK for "dbl" that lists just record names, but it gets problematic if there are multiple columns of output.
Since some sites have record names with ':', '{', .. in it, the format should handle those.
If you're now thinking about adding a column for record type, next a column for alias name, later maybe columns for plain fields, 'info' fields, .., the format should allow adding columns without breaking parsers that were written before those new columns got added.
XML or JSON already allow for all that, and would be better than creating a new format just for this record-list output.

Thanks,
Kay

On Jan 6, 2015, at 4:03 AM, Ralph Lange <Ralph.Lange@gmx.de>
 wrote:
> Many installations use the output of a 'dbl' command on an IOC to create a "list of records on this IOC" file that gets scanned by some other service. (E.g. IRMIS, ChannelFinder, PV search databases, etc.)
> 
> The 'dbl' command lists alias names as if they were records, with no distinction.
> In many cases this is desired (e.g. for a PV search database), in other cases listing only names of "real" records would be preferred (e.g. for consistency checks, some ChannelFinder applications).
> 
> Running 'dbl "" NAME' does create something that shows that extra information (both sides are equal for a record, else the left side is an alias for the right side) but obviously changes the output format.
> 
> What would be the smartest way to allow both options and make everyone happy?
> Should we go for an entirely new command with a new output format that maybe also shows the record type? ('dbl' with empty arg1 loops over the types, but does not show them.)
> One-line-per-record-straight-ascii or XMLish?



Replies:
Re: dbl output and record name aliases Michael Davidsaver
Re: dbl output and record name aliases Johnson, Andrew N.
References:
dbl output and record name aliases Ralph Lange

Navigate by Date:
Prev: dbl output and record name aliases Ralph Lange
Next: Re: dbl output and record name aliases J. Lewis Muir
Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  <20152016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: dbl output and record name aliases Ralph Lange
Next: Re: dbl output and record name aliases Michael Davidsaver
Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  <20152016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022 
ANJ, 16 Dec 2015 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·