On 06/26/2018 01:40 PM, Ralph Lange wrote:
> Merge Proposals are at
> https://code.launchpad.net/epics-base/+activereviews
Thanks.
> Heinz' RTEMS branch needs some clean-up and minimization - there are
> comments in the merge proposals that name some places.
Okay, I have read Michael's comments.
> Note that the two MPs are actually one (again), as we recently
> dropped the split-up of repo-branches for the modules formerly known
> as EPICS V3.
Nice. It looks as if the rtems5 branch is a bit behind, though, it still
has submodules for these parts.
> I was volunteering to help him do this, but it would actually be
> great if you could jump in. My arguments (same language and time
> zone) cover you in the same way, and you have a much better
> justification (as ITER does not intend to use RTEMS).
The first thing to do would be to bring the rtems5 branch up to date
with core/master. I tried to merge hj/rtems5 which succeeded but of
course that gave me only a few changes in configure. I then tried to
merge hj/rtems5libcom but that failed horribly with thousands of
rename/delete conflicts. My git-fu is rather weak so I guess my naive
attempts were doomed from the beginning...
Cheers
Ben
--
"Make it so they have to reboot after every typo." ― Scott Adams
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Replies:
- Re: RTEMS-5 integration Ralph Lange
- References:
- RTEMS-5 integration Benjamin Franksen
- Re: RTEMS-5 integration Ralph Lange
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: RTEMS-5 integration Ralph Lange
- Next:
Re: RTEMS-5 integration Ralph Lange
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
<2018>
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: RTEMS-5 integration Ralph Lange
- Next:
Re: RTEMS-5 integration Ralph Lange
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
<2018>
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|