Am 04.12.18 um 20:06 schrieb Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk:
> It would be nice if the sequencer could support long strings. I haven't
> tried to see what's possible at the moment, and I'm not suggesting you
> should try to change the definition of the string type because that
> would break existing programs, but maybe adding a new type or an option
> to allow strings to be longer than 40 might be a possibility...
Yes, absolutely. I'll have to think about how to integrate this. A new
(variable size) string type may be an option.
Cheers
Ben
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- EPICS V3 PV name length limits and how to get around them Benjamin Franksen via Core-talk
- Re: EPICS V3 PV name length limits and how to get around them Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
- Re: EPICS V3 PV name length limits and how to get around them Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk
- Re: EPICS V3 PV name length limits and how to get around them Benjamin Franksen via Core-talk
- Re: EPICS V3 PV name length limits and how to get around them Ralph Lange via Core-talk
- Re: EPICS V3 PV name length limits and how to get around them Benjamin Franksen via Core-talk
- Re: EPICS V3 PV name length limits and how to get around them Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: EPICS V3 PV name length limits and how to get around them Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk
- Next:
Build failed in Jenkins: epics-base-3.16-win64 #242 APS Jenkins via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
<2018>
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: EPICS V3 PV name length limits and how to get around them Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk
- Next:
Re: EPICS V3 PV name length limits and how to get around them Benjamin Franksen via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
<2018>
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|