On 1/14/19 8:30 AM, Ralph Lange via Core-talk wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 17:17, Kasemir, Kay via Core-talk <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>
> [...]
> The only problematic scenario would be a large waveform record where some client solely requests the timestamp.
> Always adding the complete waveform would increase the network traffic compared to just the requested timestamp, but I think that's a silly example.
>
>
> Make that a client that only wants to check the metadata of a huge image (e.g. to decide on the image size if it wants to read the image data itself), and it's not silly anymore.
This seems hypothetical. Has anyone ever wanted to do this? What was the motivation?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Replies:
- Re: 'Request' support in qsrv Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk
- References:
- 'Request' support in qsrv Kasemir, Kay via Core-talk
- Re: 'Request' support in qsrv Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
- Re: 'Request' support in qsrv Kasemir, Kay via Core-talk
- Re: 'Request' support in qsrv Ralph Lange via Core-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: 'Request' support in qsrv Kasemir, Kay via Core-talk
- Next:
Re: 'Request' support in qsrv Mark Rivers via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
<2019>
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: 'Request' support in qsrv Timo Korhonen via Core-talk
- Next:
Re: 'Request' support in qsrv Mark Rivers via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
<2019>
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|