Subject: |
Re: [Merge] ~anj/epics-base/+git/base-7.0:fix-1824277 into epics-base:7.0 |
From: |
mdavidsaver via Core-talk <[email protected]> |
To: |
Andrew Johnson <[email protected]> |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Apr 2019 20:53:21 -0000 |
I'd like to see some test coverage for the more common case of writing to eg. '.A', both when INPA="" and when INPA="5" (or other non-empty).
Does this change effect all link fields now? (eg. INP for aiRecord)
Also, have you ever seen external record support special() looking for PV_LINK? It looks to me like such cases would instead see DB_LINK or CA_LINK.
My only objection is to rushing it out. lp:1824277 does not seem to effect many users. Let's not break something which does. Maybe we merge this just after 7.0.2.2?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~anj/epics-base/+git/base-7.0/+merge/366247
Your team EPICS Core Developers is requested to review the proposed merge of ~anj/epics-base/+git/base-7.0:fix-1824277 into epics-base:7.0.
- References:
- [Merge] ~anj/epics-base/+git/base-7.0:fix-1824277 into epics-base:7.0 Andrew Johnson via Core-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: [Merge] ~anj/epics-base/+git/base-7.0:fix-1824277 into epics-base:7.0 Andrew Johnson via Core-talk
- Next:
Re: [Merge] ~anj/epics-base/+git/base-7.0:fix-1824277 into epics-base:7.0 Andrew Johnson via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
<2019>
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: [Merge] ~anj/epics-base/+git/base-7.0:fix-1824277 into epics-base:7.0 Andrew Johnson via Core-talk
- Next:
Re: [Merge] ~anj/epics-base/+git/base-7.0:fix-1824277 into epics-base:7.0 Andrew Johnson via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
<2019>
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|