Re: [EXTERNAL] CA gateway chaining

[Timo Korhonen via Core-talk <core-talk at aps.anl.gov>]

Right, this is the way we are going for now. It is not exactly trivial to manage but should be doable.

 

Thanks,

 

TImo

 

From: Core-talk <core-talk-bounces at aps.anl.gov> on behalf of EPICS Core Talk <core-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Reply-To: Ralph Lange <ralph.lange at gmx.de>
Date: Monday, 1 November 2021 at 16:18
To: EPICS Core Talk <core-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] CA gateway chaining

 

On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 10:49, Timo Korhonen via Core-talk <core-talk at aps.anl.gov> wrote:

Just a short follow-up.
We found out that the delays are due to large arrays being monitored over the gateway. Not a surprise, even if we have tried to remind users about the effects with big arrays.

 

One way to mitigate this - I think this approach was implemented at some point at the SLS - is to route the large array channels through a dedicated separate gateway instance.

(Ease of configuration depends on your naming convention.)

 

Cheers,
~Ralph