I, also, agree with Ben and Paul; following the solution-in-progress
is quite informative technically, and also I get a sense of who has
expertise in what area.
At 9:40 AM -0500 2000/02/18, Paul Sichta wrote:
I'm in agreement with all four of Ben's points, especially (3). Jeff
recently suggested to someone to use "casr" for a problem they were having.
This helped me identify a (unrelated) problem in a couple of my CA client
programs.
_____________________________________________________________________
Stephen A. Lewis | [email protected]
Mail Stop 71-259 | http://www.lbl.gov/~salewis
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory | Tel: +1.510.486.7702
Berkeley, CA 94720 USA | FAX: +1.510.486.4544
- Replies:
- Re: Improving S/N on tech-talk Christopher A. Larrieu
- References:
- Improving S/N on tech-talk Harvey Rarback
- Re: Improving S/N on tech-talk Benjamin Franksen
- Re: Improving S/N on tech-talk Paul Sichta
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: NetTask problem Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Re: Improving S/N on tech-talk Christopher A. Larrieu
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Improving S/N on tech-talk Paul Sichta
- Next:
Re: Improving S/N on tech-talk Christopher A. Larrieu
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|