RE: PID records

[Mark Rivers <RIVERS@cars3.uchicago.edu>]

From:	CARS3::RIVERS       "Mark Rivers" 30-JUN-2000 11:58:58.78
To:	SMTP%"franksen@mail.bessy.de"
CC:	RIVERS
Subj:	RE: PID records


Hi,

> is there a conclusion how we proceed with the PID record and its two
> proposed replacements, the EPID and the CPID?
> 
> If not, I suggest that an effort is made to merge the additional
> features and enhancements of EPID and CPID into one official new PID
> record.

I have dropped the ball on this as we are in the middle of a run.  I am
preparing an analysis which shows that CPID does not behave as a PID loop
should theoretically behave, but I have not had time to write this up and post
it yet.  I am on vacation (hah!) till July 10.  I think that merging the best
of EPID and CPID is a good idea and I'll be happy to work on it when I return.

Mark