Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

I am finding poor response times for the portable CA server.  Doing a 'get'
for a PV on an IOC gives a typical response time of about 3 msec, rising to
about 10 msec max.  Doing a 'get' for a PV on a workstation running the
'excas' example PV server gives a typical response time of about 100 msec,
rising to 600 msec max.  I get the same behavior under Solaris and under
Linux, neither workstation is heavily loaded.

Can anyone explain the difference, and is there anything I can do to improve
the performance?

Epics versions R3.13.1, R3.13.2
Workstation(s) Sparc 20 w/ Solaris & 450 MHz PII w/ Red Hat Linux 6.2

Replies:

RE: Performance of portable CA server ? Jeff Hill

Navigate by Date:

Prev: memory leak - 7/10/00 cpu used is 74.7% normally 61-62% luchini

Next: RE: Performance of portable CA server ? Jeff Hill

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <2000>  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: RE: memory leak - 7/10/00 cpu used is 74.7% normally 61-62% Allison, Stephanie

Next: RE: Performance of portable CA server ? Jeff Hill

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <2000>  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024