Geoff,
I don't recall hearing about a problem of this nature, and I just
spent a few minutes attempting to reproduce this with what will
soon be R3.13.2 with no success.
Jeff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoff Savage [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 10:31 AM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: caRepeater R3.13 vs. R3.14
>
> Hi,
>
> When I first tried to run ca_test after building R3.14.1 on
> Linux I
> received a segmentation fault. After killing caRepeater and
> running
> ca_test again everything worked fine. As I suspected the
> interaction
> with a R3.14 CA client with a R3.13 caRepeater is not optimal.
> Is this
> the expected behaviour? Ca_test from R3.13 does work with the
> R3.14
> caRepeater.
>
> Geoff
- References:
- caRepeater R3.13 vs. R3.14 Geoff Savage
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Asynchronous Device Support Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
dbGetLink error Kevin Tsubota
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
<2003>
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
caRepeater R3.13 vs. R3.14 Geoff Savage
- Next:
problems switching ioc's ip address Dale L. Brewe
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
<2003>
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|