Peter Denison at Diamond has provided a work-around for our systems (it
was giving us some real headaches!) He managed to lift it out of EPICS
base and created a subArray support package, which if loaded before
EPICS base, would ensure correct behaviour (we're using R3.14.8.2).
I suggest you contact Peter for further details - I believe it was
relatively straight forward.
(Maybe, when you read this Peter, you may consider posting the method to
tech-talk??)
Ian
Ian Gillingham,
Diamond Light Source
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of J. Lewis Muir
Sent: 24 April 2008 16:12
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: sub-array question
On 4/24/08 10:53 AM, John Dobbins wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have a waveform record which reads consecutive values from hardware
> memory (happens to be Modbus over ethernet). I then use a subArray
> record to pick out individual values. However if the hardware goes
> off-line (so the waveform is temporarily invalid) the subArray record
> changes its INDX field to 0! When the hardware comes back on-line the
> subArray record now points to the wrong location in the waveform.
>
> Is this intended? Suggestions for avoiding this situation?
Hi, John.
I reported the same problem last year. An archive of the discussion is
at
http://www.aps.anl.gov/epics/tech-talk/2007/msg01432.php
I wish the fix could go into an earlier version of EPICS base, but maybe
Andrew is concerned about changing the behavior and thus possibly
breaking existing databases?
-lewis
--
J. Lewis Muir
Software Engineer
IMCA-CAT/CARS
<DIV><FONT size="1" color="gray">This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
</FONT></DIV>
- References:
- Re: sub-array question J. Lewis Muir
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: sub-array question J. Lewis Muir
- Next:
Re: sub-array question Geoff Savage
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
<2008>
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: sub-array question J. Lewis Muir
- Next:
Re: sub-array question Geoff Savage
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
<2008>
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|