Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
|
All,
I've come across an unexpected behavior with monitors on the VAL* fields
of the aSub record. It seems that the default is to post monitors only
on change (EFLG="ON CHANGE").
Unfortunately, the calculation to determine if the value has changed
doesn't work correctly in some cases. The issue is that while the
previous values are saved, the length of the previous values are not.
So the comparison test uses the same length (NEV*) for VAL* and OVL*.
Thus, if the change is that the array gets smaller, but the remaining
values are unchanged, then no monitor is posted.
The obvious solution is to add another set of fields to track the number
of element in the old value. Does this seem reasonable? Also, how to
express "the number of element in OVLA" in 4 characters or less?
Michael
- Replies:
- Re: aSub, EFLG, and array length changes Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: How can I collect data values Dirk Zimoch
- Next:
caget -c J. Lewis Muir
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: Oxford CryoStream 700 support in EPICS? matthew.pearson
- Next:
Re: aSub, EFLG, and array length changes Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
<2012>
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|
ANJ, 18 Nov 2013 |
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·
·
Search
·
EPICS V4
·
IRMIS
·
Talk
·
Bugs
·
Documents
·
Links
·
Licensing
·
|