On 3/20/13 12:43 PM, Mark Rivers wrote:
> Unfortunately we need to live with these names, it's too late to change them now.
Hi, Mark.
Thanks for your explanation. That is really confusing.
I agree that it's too late to change the names, but have you considered
adding new names? That way, things could be more clear for new
development that doesn't need to be backward compatible. It could also
make the documentation clearer since, for old names that are poor, you
could refer to the new names they map to.
To make new names, you could append the digit '2' to the names:
connect2, disconnect2, connectDevice2, etc. Or you could add the words
'to' or 'from' to the names: connectTo, disconnectFrom, connectToDevice,
etc. Or you could change the vocabulary to words like "bind", "attach",
etc. Or there are probably other good schemes.
Lewis
- Replies:
- Re: drvAsynIPPort question Sinisa Veseli
- References:
- drvAsynIPPort question Sinisa Veseli
- RE: drvAsynIPPort question Mark Rivers
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: drvAsynIPPort question Sinisa Veseli
- Next:
Re: drvAsynIPPort question Sinisa Veseli
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: drvAsynIPPort question Sinisa Veseli
- Next:
Re: drvAsynIPPort question Sinisa Veseli
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|