On Nov 27, 2013, at 11:29 AM, Evgeniy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks, Andrew and Emmanuel for your replies.
>
> I am running Soft IOC on Dell server (64 bit) with eight Intel Xeon CPUs, each 2.27GHz.
> It seems that syntax for dbd file is correct. I found that minimum scan period for my system is 0.001 seconds. For shorter periods it falls down to 0.1 second, as Andrew mentioned.
> The difference in one CPU usage is only 5% if I run records with scan 0.1 second or 0.001 second. It looks like it is limitation of EPICS, not hardware.
Or perhaps the kernel timer implementation has a resolution of 1 ms?
> What is the bottleneck for processing of a record on GHz CPUs?
> Is it possible to improve it?
>
> Evgeniy
--
Eric Norum
[email protected]
- Replies:
- Re: Increasing scan rate to 10 kHz Evgeniy
- References:
- Increasing scan rate to 10 kHz Evgeniy
- Re: Increasing scan rate to 10 kHz Andrew Johnson
- Re: Increasing scan rate to 10 kHz Evgeniy
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Increasing scan rate to 10 kHz Evgeniy
- Next:
Re: Alarm Handler Jack
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Increasing scan rate to 10 kHz Evgeniy
- Next:
Re: Increasing scan rate to 10 kHz Evgeniy
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|