From: Ralph Lange [mailto:[email protected]]
> Comparisons between numbers and non-numbers (such as NaN) are
> undefined.
Not quite: comparisons involving NaN are defined to always return false. This means that a test of the form
if (prec->drvl <= value && value <= prec->drvh)
// accept value
else
// reject value
would have the desired effect (and setting a drv limit would cause all values to be rejected!)
> What is your suggestion on how to check limits for a non-number without
> using comparisons?
>
> > We also found that you can type "NaN" at any entry field in DM2K
> which
> > writes NaN directly to the PV.
>
> NaN, -inf and +inf are valid values for a double. Why would you reject
> entering valid values in entry fields?
>
> Cheers,
> ~Ralph
- Replies:
- Re: NaN and analog records Dirk Zimoch
- References:
- NaN and analog records Benjamin Franksen
- Re: NaN and analog records Goetz Pfeiffer
- Re: NaN and analog records Ralph Lange
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: NaN and analog records Ralph Lange
- Next:
support for NIKHEF Hall probes Pierrick Hanlet
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
<2014>
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: NaN and analog records Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
Re: NaN and analog records Dirk Zimoch
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
<2014>
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|