Re: sequencer release 2.2.1

[Paul Hamadyk <paul.hamadyk@diamond.ac.uk>]

On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 14:30 +0100, Benjamin Franksen wrote:
> This is the first proper (stable) release of version 2.2 of the
> sequencer. As mentioned in a previous post, the sequencer home page at
> 
>   http://www-csr.bessy.de/control/SoftDist/sequencer/
> 
> now documents version 2.2. There are links to the old (version 2.1) page
> in several places for easier navigation. The old page can also be
> directly reached via
> 

Good morning sequencer users,

I've just tried to build seq-2.2.1

In test/validate pvAssignStress.st and pvAssignSubst.st both have the
same program name of pvAssignSubstTest which leads to:

pvAssignStress.o(.data+0x7c): multiple definition of `pvAssignSubstTest'
pvAssignSubst.o(.data+0x0): first defined here
pvAssignStress.o(.data+0xb4): multiple definition of
`pvar_func_pvAssignSubstTestRegistrar'

When running the tests I get this:

make -s runtests
snc_test.t .. Useless use of reference constructor in void context at
snc_test.t line 62.
Can't locate object method "subtest" via package "cast" (perhaps you
forgot to load "cast"?) at snc_test.t line 62.
# Looks like your test exited with 255 before it could output anything.
snc_test.t .. Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
Failed 23/23 subtests 

Test Summary Report
-------------------
snc_test.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
  Non-zero exit status: 255
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 23 tests but ran 0.
Files=1, Tests=0,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.01 sys +  0.02 cusr
0.00 csys =  0.05 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/1 test programs. 0/0 subtests failed.

I can fix the first problem but what about the tests?

Paul


-- 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. 
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom