Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

Benjamin Franksen <[email protected]> · Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:37:17 +0200

On 09.10.2016 20:37, Michael Davidsaver wrote:
>  For various annoying reasons it is *not* sufficient to let a connected
> Channel be destroyed (as in c++ destructor).  Calling Channel::destory()
> is mandatory.

Hi Michael

out of curiosity: could you elaborate on that? Has this to do with
possible exceptions that may be thrown when disconnecting a channel?
(Throwing out of a destructor is commonly seen as something to be
avoided.) Is this different in the Java implementation?

Cheers
Ben
-- 
"Make it so they have to reboot after every typo." ― Scott Adams

Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System