On 11/2/22 07:28, Kasemir, Kay via Tech-talk wrote:
I think this shows that the "info(Q:group, ..." approach may not be the one, only and final way to assemble information from records into custom PV Access data structures.
Info tags can be useful to configure a simple aggregation of records into a combined data type. But if we then want to control the exact naming and layout of the resulting structure, add details about the order of timing, time stamps, .. we're starting to invent a new programming syntax.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenspun%27s_tenth_rule
I think that our .db files have enough brackets to qualify.
- References:
- NTNDArray with attributes using QSRV group Pas Joao Paulo Martins via Tech-talk
- Re: NTNDArray with attributes using QSRV group Pas Kasemir, Kay via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: NTNDArray with attributes using QSRV group Pas Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: Re: [EXTERNAL] phoebus display runtime chenhuiting--- via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
<2022>
2023
2024
2025
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: NTNDArray with attributes using QSRV group Pas Joao Paulo Martins via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: NTNDArray with attributes using QSRV group Pas Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
<2022>
2023
2024
2025
|