Subject: |
CAMAC |
From: |
[email protected] (Bob Dalesio) |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Nov 94 01:09:00 MST |
There are currently two schools of thought on the addressing of cAMAC.
One puts the configuration parameters into a proliferation of DTYPs
The other overloads the param field.
Is there a way to install the driver that either will work?
Should we standardizer on one or the other?
Should we be tolerant until version 4 comes along and fiexs this problem?
In the mean time which should be intsalled to demonstrate CAMAC.
Bob
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
More News About Duke Carl Dickey
- Next:
Re: CAMAC Marty Kraimer
- Index:
<1994>
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
More News About Duke Carl Dickey
- Next:
Re: CAMAC Marty Kraimer
- Index:
<1994>
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
|