Subject: |
Re: CALC Records |
From: |
[email protected] |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Nov 94 09:36:33 -0600 |
>So to say that such changes could be implemented and the known effects minimized
>by a script that changes CALC expressions in CALC records is quite dangerous.
I don't recall anyone saying anything about conversion sripts and compatibility
in this thread... yet.
>The handy routines "postfix" and "calcPerform" have been used by other record
>types (at least two that I know of).
>...
>If the problem is that you don't like the way the CALC is specified, fix that
>with a different record type (e.g. "CCALC") and NEW routines.
If the old rutines MUST stay, I would vote for this too.
--John
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: CALC Records Ned Arnold
- Next:
CALC record Deb Kerstiens
- Index:
<1994>
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: CALC Records Ned Arnold
- Next:
CALC record Deb Kerstiens
- Index:
<1994>
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
|