|
Subject: |
Re: dvx 2502 |
|
From: |
[email protected] (Jeff Hill) |
|
Date: |
Tue, 28 Mar 95 13:55:51 MST |
>
> While thumbing through the driver, I noticed
> the register map structure pads out to 128 bytes, while the board base
> addresses are selectable at 64 byte boundaries. Is there a particular
> reason why the driver was set up this way? We can save some short IO
> space by changing it.
Am I misssing something? It looks like it pads to a 64 byte boundary
to me.
struct dvx_2502
{
unsigned short dev_id; /* device id code (CFF5) */
unsigned short dev_type; /* type code (B100) */
unsigned short csr; /* control and status register */
unsigned short seq_offst; /* sequence RAM offset register */
unsigned short mem_attr; /* memory attribute register */
unsigned short samp_rate; /* sample rate register */
unsigned short dma_point; /* DMA pointer register */
unsigned short dma_data; /* DMA data register */
unsigned short thresh; /* threshold register */
unsigned short fifo; /* input fifo */
unsigned short end_pad[54]; /* pad to 64 byte boundary */
};
Jeff
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
DVX2502 addressing Claude Saunders
- Next:
dvx 2502 Jeff Hill
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
DVX2502 addressing Claude Saunders
- Next:
dvx 2502 Jeff Hill
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
|