Re; Marty's proposal:
> If we are going to have a new general purpose subroutine record then I would
> like to suggest one of the following.
[Two items deleted]
I have wanted a more general subroutine record. Let's find a time to
brainstorm over the 7-8 working days coming up in Chicago. Marty's
ideas seem like a good place to start.
Steve Lewis
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: EPICS status codes proposal Jim B. Kowalkowski
- Next:
Re: Subroutine record input fields don't get archived Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Subroutine record input fields don't get archived Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Re: Subroutine record input fields don't get archived Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
| 
