Re: Subroutine record input fields don't get archived

[mrk@aps.anl.gov (Marty Kraimer)]

> From wright@luke.atdiv.lanl.gov Thu Oct 26 15:06 CDT 1995
> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 95 14:06:33 MDT
> From: wright@luke.atdiv.lanl.gov (Rozelle Wright)
> To: lewis@csg.lbl.gov
> Subject: Re: Subroutine record input fields don't get archived
> Cc: tech-talk@aps.anl.gov
> Content-Type> : > text> 
> Content-Length: 1807
...

> I would like record processing code to provide the capability of archiving
> any field which is capable of being monitored.  
> This goes back to the original question which 
> started this thread of discussion. It was very confusing to see monitored
> values change on the operator screen when they did not change in the archived
> snapshots.
> In that example Marty's suggestion of the change to db_post in the
> section of code that posts monitors for the psub->a,psub->b...
> to
> db_post_events(psub,pnew,monitor_mask|DBE_VALUE|DBE_LOG) would do
> this for the current version of subroutine records.
> Rozelle Wright

Please note that the calc record has the same problem.
I have made this change to calc and sub in my development node so that it will
go into the next release (may be too late for 3.12.2).

Marty Kraimer