Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
|
Marty said:
> Last week during a visit at DESY, Gabor Csuka
> suggested that the ai and ao records should have two additional
> fields RAWH and RAWL...
Is there any mileage in defining some conventions on use of the PARM field
(would have to be bus-specific I suspect) to accomplish such things? Such
information could be thought of as a sort of DTYP sub-addressing, so what
now requires a different DTYP could in the future require the same DTYP
but a different PARM.
W.
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Should ai, ao records have RAWH, RAWL? Jeff Hill
- Next:
Re: Should ai, ao records have RAWH, RAWL? Ned Arnold
- Index:
1994
1995
<1996>
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: Should ai, ao records have RAWH, RAWL? 415
- Next:
Re: Should ai, ao records have RAWH, RAWL? Ned Arnold
- Index:
1994
1995
<1996>
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|
ANJ, 10 Aug 2010 |
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·
·
Search
·
EPICS V4
·
IRMIS
·
Talk
·
Bugs
·
Documents
·
Links
·
Licensing
·
|