>
> Finally, there seems to be a popular conception that MEDM is
> slower than DM. Informal testing, however, has indicated that their
> runtime performance is very similar. Older versions of MEDM were
> noticeably slower to start up with very large (over 1 MB) ADL files.
> This version has not been tested against DM with those files. Both
> programs will continue to be developed, and an attempt will be made to
> keep their features consistent. It should be noted that the version
> of MEDM released by DESY is not part of this MEDM distribution
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bad to here it. Is it any chance to get a common one ?
> sequence.
>
> -Ken
>
Regards,
Gabor Csuka
--
DESY, Germany
- Replies:
- Re: MEDM 2.3.3 Roland Mueller
- References:
- MEDM 2.3.3 Ken Evans
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Keithley and EPICS Jan Chrin
- Next:
medm/dm performance comparison Matt Bickley
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
<1997>
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
MEDM 2.3.3 Ken Evans
- Next:
Re: MEDM 2.3.3 Roland Mueller
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
<1997>
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|