> I think it would be a really bad idea to edit existing schematics.
> Default values don't appear in schematics, only values that overwrite
> defaults actually show up in the .sch files.
True, but be careful ... as soon as you change the defaults in the symbols,
you might get into a resonable mess, since (old default) values that didn't
show up should now and vice versa.
IMHO the only reliable consistence proof is diffing the dbst-filtered
(i.e. optimized and sorted) databases generated from these schematics.
Ralph
- References:
- Re: dbst problem when built against 3.13.1(actually problem with capfast symbols) Rozelle Wright
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Job Opportunities Hamid Shoaee
- Next:
Perl problem with EPICS PC build Kay-Uwe Kasemir
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
<1999>
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: dbst problem when built against 3.13.1(actually problem with capfast symbols) Rozelle Wright
- Next:
Job Opportunities Hamid Shoaee
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
<1999>
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|