[email protected] said:
> Hi Bill -
>
> >The version I have is dated "6/20/94." Is this the correct version?
>
> I have one dated 12/6/96. It's appended to this mail so you can see
> if there are any differences.
>
> Stephanie
Many thanks - 'diff' sez that there are some differences but they're not
in the area of the errors, and I still get the same errors with the version
that you sent me.
BTW - the version I have has the same revision date comment, but "diff"
claims that they are different. Looking at the lines that "diff" printed,
I don't see the differences except for one skipped blank line near the end
of the file. FWIW.
Line 302 is a comment which follows what appears to have to do with the
default color rule and alarm colors. At least that's what the comments
say. Also, it's right before "fix up foreground and background colors."
Any more suggestions? Anyone?
-bill
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Anyone using/supporting e2sr? Rozelle Wright
- Next:
Switching from a 167 to a 162 Dennis M. Reichhold
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
eddCvrt1.16To2.2 Bill Brown
- Next:
Re: eddCvrt1.16To2.2 Deb Kerstiens
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|