It seems that we all agree that the one in base needs to go. Perhaps we
could include both EPID and CPID. Rename EPID to be PID. It appears to be a
correct version of what PID attempted to do. CPID is special in that it
includes some model features. If CPID has some of the same problems that
were found in PID, it would be worthwhile to fix them. Someone at JLab may
want to look at this.
Is anyone using the original PID? SUccessfully? That would mind if we
changed this?
Bob
- Replies:
- Re: Proposed R3.13.3 Benjamin Franksen
- PID records [was Re: Proposed R3.13.3] Brian Bevins
- References:
- Re: Proposed R3.13.3 Mark Rivers
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: Proposed R3.13.3 Redman, Russell O.
- Next:
Re: Proposed R3.13.3 Marty Kraimer
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Proposed R3.13.3 Mark Rivers
- Next:
Re: Proposed R3.13.3 Benjamin Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|