> The *client* has the final decision, which pvs to group into a request,
> subject to the restriction that these pvs must be provided by the same
> server instance.
Forbidden restriction, as it breaks the CA axiom that connections are
done by channel name only, indepent from servers.
> New record types will therefore *not* break existing clients.
But splitting a database on two servers will. Not a good idea.
Ralph
- Replies:
- Re: Proposals for the Next Generation CA Benjamin Franksen
- References:
- RE: Proposals for the Next Generation CA Jeff Hill
- Re: Proposals for the Next Generation CA Benjamin Franksen
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: reading arrays with dbr_ctrl_xxx from CA-Server Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
Re: Proposals for the Next Generation CA Benjamin Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Proposals for the Next Generation CA Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
Re: Proposals for the Next Generation CA Benjamin Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|