Kay-Uwe Kasemir wrote:
> I just think that writing files via NFS must be lame compared to
> ChannelAccess: NFS performs round-trip requests to "open", "write",
> "write", "write", .. then "close".
Keep in mind that NFS writes in much larger pieces than CA does, so there
won't be that many "writes".
An example from one of our IOCs:
SR: 118 channels + header -> NFS file = 2853 bytes = 2 data packets
With the protocol overhead included, the difference in network load is
probably much less than you imply.
( Difficult to be quantitative about CA without that protocol spec.... )
- brian
- References:
- RE: Channel Watcher V2.0 Zelazny, Michael S.
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: Channel Watcher V2.0 Zelazny, Michael S.
- Next:
RE: Channel Watcher V2.0 Zelazny, Michael S.
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
<2002>
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: Channel Watcher V2.0 Zelazny, Michael S.
- Next:
RE: Channel Watcher V2.0 Zelazny, Michael S.
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
<2002>
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|