Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  <20032004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  <20032004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: NI1014 GPIB controller
From: Marty Kraimer <mrk@aps.anl.gov>
To: tech-talk@aps.anl.gov
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 07:13:02 -0500
Has anyone successfully used SRQs with the NI1014?

Another way of asking is has anyone successfully used GPIBREADW,
or GPIBEFASTIW with the NI1014 GPIB interface.

Does anyone really require DMA?

If programed transfers are used instead of DMA there are two big advantages.

1) A24 DMA is no longer required. Thus it will no longer be necessary
to modify the board support packages in order to support the NI1014.

2) The driver could be modified to support other GPIB controllers that
use an NEC uPD7210-compatible register set.


Marty Kraimer



Navigate by Date:
Prev: ways to add driver support layer for rtems ioc M.C.Shao
Next: Re: how to prevent ioc app from being built for both target and host? Marty Kraimer
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  <20032004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: ways to add driver support layer for rtems ioc M.C.Shao
Next: RE: NI1014 GPIB controller Mark Rivers
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  <20032004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020 
ANJ, 10 Aug 2010 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·