Experimental Physics and
| |||||||||||||||||
|
Dalesio, Leo `Bob` wrote: It seems that we are diverging on these. It is a little worrisome, as operating system problems are ones that are very difficult to find and fix. It would seem most efficient to limit the number of these that we employ.For KEK/KEKB, there is a good reason to port EPICS on iTRON. First of all, Many inteligent devices available on the market in JAPAN uses SH CPU and iTRON for its inteligent controller. That means that there already exists BSP to support this device on iTRON. These devices may have enough CPU, memory and network connection. In some cases, the company supplies SDK for it. So once EPICS is ported to iTRON, there may be a good chance to hook these devices on EPICS based network directly. Since iTRON is quite popular in JAPAN, there would be not so difficult an engineer familiar with iTRON and even support from companies. The fact that eCos support ITRON API, I have a hope to share some code between osd for eCos an iTRON. It may reduce a cost of code maintenance in future, I agree that if I start a new project I will limit a number of (RT)OSses in the system. I also don't wants to increase a number of OSes "officially supported" in EPICS. However, we should not restrict someone to port EPICS on other (RT) OSes, as far as they take their responsibility. I hope that we, EPICS commuity, will be open to change "officialy supported" OSes in future, if there would be a good reason to do so. We don't even know if WindsRiver or PowerPC still survive after 5 to 10 years Regards, Noboru
| ||||||||||||||||
ANJ, 02 Sep 2010 |
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing · |