1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 <2010> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 | Index | 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 <2010> 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
<== Date ==> | <== Thread ==> |
---|
Subject: | RE: Options for reviving old Allen Bradley PLC implementations |
From: | Bryce Karnaghan <[email protected]> |
To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 9 Nov 2010 09:15:10 +1100 |
Another
option could be to use Prosoft modbus module “MVI46-MNET” and
the rich EPICS modbus support from Mark Rivers and others. One
issue I have found with Prosoft modules is that as it is a completely standalone
processor it is possible that the PLC could be stopped and the Prosoft module will
continue to communicate stale values up to the IOC. I would be implementing
heartbeats (in both directions) in the PLC logic. Bryce
Karnaghan From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chestnut, Ronald P. We
have a number of old Allen Bradley PLC implementations here at SLAC. One of
these uses a Data Communication Card (DCM) in VME is connected to the SLC5
SLC500s. One path we are considering is using an RSLogix PLC (which has good
EPICS support) as the master PLC, and slaving the SLC5 PLC to that. It turns
out that there exists a package to translate the ladder logic from SLC500 to
RSLogix. Another
group here is asking the following: “We
have some old SLC 5/04 PLCs from Allen Bradley that we wanted to make EPICS
compatible. I found a third party SLC module that talks Ether/IP: Will
this module work to provide the EPICS support? “ Another
piece of information is from Ernest Williams: He warned us against the direct
SLC-50x EPICS driver support, since it uses its own protocol (DFI?) and has a
poor reputation and poor support. So
the questions to the community are How
are you reviving old PLC support? What has or has not worked? What do you
recommend? Ron
Chestnut This message and any attachments may contain proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or you received the message in error, you must not use, copy or distribute the message. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original message. Thank you. |