Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

Hi Till,

Originally, there were only A-J input fields in the genSub
and the idea was that you would set-up all the input fields
with values and then make the record process by writing to
what was then then the last field. I didn't want to make
it process before I had set-up all the fields.

Cheers,

Andy



On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Till Straumann wrote:

> I saw that - in contrast to good old subRecord - the
> various input fields (A..U) of aSub or genSub
> do not have the pp(TRUE) attribute, i.e., when I
> change one of these inputs the record is not processed
> (if passive).
>
> As a curiosity, the genSub record had just input
> field J with pp(TRUE).
>
> Can someone enlighten me why these records were
> designed this way? It would seem more useful to me
> that when I write to an input field the record
> should process.
>
> - Till
>

References:

gensub/asub inputs not PP Till Straumann

Navigate by Date:

Prev: CSS BOY Meter widget limits Paweł Prędki

Next: Re: CSS BOY Meter widget limits Kasemir, Kay

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  <2011>  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: gensub/asub inputs not PP Till Straumann

Next: bo Record not forcing VAL to 0 or 1 Bruce Hill

Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  <2011>  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024