On 4/19/11 1:16 PM, Jay Steele wrote:
> Does anybody have any ideas or implementations to fix
> TPMAC so that there isn't this minimum move time of
> 0.25 second? I have not dug into the internal logic yet
> but thought I would check with the EPICS community
> first.
Hi, Jay.
The last paragraph of the comment (i.e. "A cleaner fix ...")
includes some suggestions on possible ways to do that.
However, I think at some point you will come up against the rate
at which the PMAC is being polled by the driver. I think this
is 10 Hz right now. If you need to get that move time below 0.1
seconds, I think the driver poll rate would need to be increased.
Lewis
- Replies:
- Re: question about fix for AssyGeneric_scanrec_v2.db patch in tpmac module (results in 0.25 s minimum move time) Daron Chabot
- References:
- question about fix for AssyGeneric_scanrec_v2.db patch in tpmac module (results in 0.25 s minimum move time) Jay Steele
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
question about fix for AssyGeneric_scanrec_v2.db patch in tpmac module (results in 0.25 s minimum move time) Jay Steele
- Next:
Re: question about fix for AssyGeneric_scanrec_v2.db patch in tpmac module (results in 0.25 s minimum move time) Daron Chabot
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
question about fix for AssyGeneric_scanrec_v2.db patch in tpmac module (results in 0.25 s minimum move time) Jay Steele
- Next:
Re: question about fix for AssyGeneric_scanrec_v2.db patch in tpmac module (results in 0.25 s minimum move time) Daron Chabot
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
<2011>
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|