On Thu Jun 13 2013 08:44:07 GMT+0200 (CEST), Hinko Kočevar
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Michael,
>
> We were thinking about the same approach, using dfanout to get the
> SCAN value fanned out to the the destination records. Will give a try
> with the dfanout records.
>
> Ralph, we're going to give it a try, haven't worked with the seq rcord
> though until now.
In this no-frills application, the used seq functionality is very
similar to a dfanout. Main difference in this case: a seq has 10
outputs, compared to 8 for a dfanout.
~Ralph
- Replies:
- Re: Changing SCAN field in many records Fabian S.
- References:
- Changing SCAN field in many records Hinko Kočevar
- RE: Changing SCAN field in many records michael.abbott
- Re: Changing SCAN field in many records Ralph Lange
- Re: Changing SCAN field in many records Hinko Kočevar
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Changing SCAN field in many records Hinko Kočevar
- Next:
LAN GPIB BOGARD Daniel
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Changing SCAN field in many records Hinko Kočevar
- Next:
Re: Changing SCAN field in many records Fabian S.
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
| 
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·